Press Release

California Right to Know Calls for Criminal Investigation of No on 37 For Possible Fraud for Misuse of FDA Seal and Fabricated FDA Quote

For Immediate Release: Thursday, October 18, 2012
Contact: Gary Ruskin, 425-944-7350,

Washington DC -- Today, the California Right to Know Yes on 37 campaign sent letters to the U.S. Department of Justice requesting a criminal investigation of the No on 37 campaign for possible fraudulent misuse of the official seal of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 

“The Justice Department should investigate this fraudulent dirty trick perpetrated by the No on 37 campaign,” said Gary Ruskin, campaign manager of California Right to Know Yes on 37.  “They are running a campaign of lies, deceit and trickery, and some of it may be criminal.”

The No on 37 campaign affixed the FDA’s seal to one of the campaign’s mailers.  Section 506 of the U.S. Criminal Code states: “Whoever….knowingly uses, affixes, or impresses any such fraudulently made, forged, counterfeited, mutilated, or altered seal or facsimile thereof to or upon any certificate, instrument, commission, document, or paper of any description….shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.”

The letter also provides evidence that the No on 37 campaign falsely attributed a direct quote to FDA in the campaign mailer. The quoted attribution, which appears below, is entirely false and fabricated. FDA did not make this statement and does not take a position on Prop 37.





The letter from California Right to Know was sent today to Lanny Breuer, Assistant Attorney General of the USDOJ Criminal Division; Laurel Rimon, Chief of the Special Prosecutions Unit of the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of California; and Vincent Tolino, Director of the Ethics and Integrity staff at the FDA.



The latest transgressions follows a litany of deceptions committed by the No on 37 campaign, whose top six funders are the six largest pesticide companies in the world.

The No on 37 campaign has repeatedly misrepresented the university affiliation of their lead spokesperson, Dr. Miller, in campaign ads, in violation of Stanford University policy.

The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the nation's largest professional association for nutritionists and dieticians, accused the No on 37 campaign of misrepresenting its position and misleading voters  with false statements in the official California Voter's Guide.

“We are concerned that California voters are being misled," Academy President Ethan Bergman said in a press release. "Voters need accurate information in order to make an informed choice."

The anti-Proposition 37 ads that are now blanketing the state have been described as misleading by the San Jose Mercury News, Sacramento Bee, and San Francisco Chronicle.

Proposition 37 would require labeling of genetically engineered food in California.

For more information about the California Right to Know campaign, see



Do you like this post?

Showing 26 reactions

followed this page 2015-05-04 16:19:21 -0700
followed this page 2013-10-14 03:26:12 -0700
commented 2013-09-17 03:39:03 -0700 · Flag
Your good knowledge and kindness in playing with all the pieces was very useful. I do not know what I would have done if I had not encountered such a step like this. Thank you a lot for providing visitors like us with a very interesting post worth to read and obviously critical reviews you have served in this site.
commented 2012-11-01 06:09:11 -0700 · Flag
commented 2012-10-31 20:14:11 -0700 · Flag
commented 2012-10-31 19:24:46 -0700 · Flag
How about a petition to the California State Attorney General to investigate these assholes for fraud and possible related crimes? I have no idea how to write such a petition, but if someone who does will help me, I will get it started in circulation. If you want to help, please e-mail me at: We really need to be sure these subverters of the election process are held accountable for their crimminal behavior. Thanks!
2012-10-23 09:16:44 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-23 09:14:09 -0700 · Flag
commented 2012-10-22 22:11:08 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-22 08:54:38 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-22 08:52:17 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-21 22:05:10 -0700 · Flag
commented 2012-10-21 21:51:02 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-20 15:02:15 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-19 16:43:34 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-19 16:00:42 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-19 15:48:52 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-19 11:07:58 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-19 09:31:21 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-18 20:57:16 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-18 16:19:24 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-18 15:59:10 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-18 15:52:01 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-18 13:40:31 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-18 13:31:00 -0700 · Flag
2012-10-18 13:05:27 -0700 · Flag