Stacy Malkan


Right to Know Letter to U.S. Department of Justice

This letter from California Right to Know was sent today to Lanny Breuer, Assistant Attorney General of the USDOJ Criminal Division; Laurel Rimon, Chief of the Special Prosecutions Unit of the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of California; and Vincent Tolino, Director of the Ethics and Integrity staff at the FDA.



Statement about Bogus Economic Analysis of GMO Labeling Costs - Yes on Prop 37

The same companies that told us DDT and Agent Orange were safe and that have a history of misleading the public with bad science are now making false claims that Proposition 37 will raise the cost of groceries by hundreds of dollars a year.

The No on 37 campaign’s recent economic analysis of Proposition 37, conducted by Northbridge Environmental Management Consultants, is based on so many flawed premises that it is an entirely useless analysis of the California ballot initiative for labeling genetically engineered foods. Northbridge has no economic expertise; they are a consulting firm best known for opposing recycling laws for the soda pop industry.

In contrast, a real economic study on Proposition 37 conducted by Joanna Shepherd Bailey, Ph.D., a tenured professor at Emory University School of Law, found that: “Consumers will likely see no increases in prices as a result of the relabeling required.” Among the report’s findings –- backed by empirical literature and historical precedents – is that companies’ fear of losing customers due to increasing grocery prices is a significant deterrent to passing on the “trivial” labeling costs to consumers.

“California consumers know that putting a little ink on a label is not going to change food prices,” said Stacy Malkan, Media Director of California Right to Know. “No one is going to be fooled by this work of fiction dressed up in a little economic flourish.”


followed News 2014-03-13 04:12:16 -0700

Newsroom

The whole world is watching what we are doing in California!

Support the Right To Know!

Take a look at the incredible attention the grassroots-driven campaign for our Right to Know is generating.

Sign up now as a supporter! Join us on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.

For Election Night inquiries, contact Leslie Fulbright at leslie@carighttoknow.org

For press inquiries, contact Stacy Malkan at stacy@carighttoknow.org or 510-542-9224.


Monsanto, Pesticide Companies Spend $5.5 Million More to Defeat Right to Know GMO Labeling Measure; Opposition Funds Total $32 Million

For Immediate Release: : Monday, Sept. 17, 2012
Contact: Gary Ruskin (415) 944-7350; gary@carighttoknow.org

Sacramento, Calif. --  Monsanto just gave an additional $2.89 million to defeat Proposition 37, which would require labeling of genetically engineered foods in California. Monsanto’s total contribution against Proposition 37 now stands at $7.1 million, according to campaign finance disclosure records filed with the California Secretary of State.

Other major pesticide companies also just made major additional contributions to defeat Proposition 37, including DuPont ($874,800), Dow AgroSciences ($815,200), Bayer CropScience ($381,600), BASF Plant Science ($357,700) and Syngenta ($178,700).

“Monsanto wants to buy this election so they can keep hiding what’s really in our food,” said Gary Ruskin, campaign manager of the Yes on Proposition 37 campaign.  “They are on the losing side of history.  Californians want the right to know what’s in our food, and we will win it.”

The “Big 6” pesticide firms (Monsanto, DuPont, Bayer, Dow, BASF and Syngenta) have contributed $19 million of the $32 million that the No on 37 campaign has raised.

 


Democratic Party Supports Prop 37: Beware of Slate Cards from Fake Democratic Groups!

The opposition is hard at work trying to mislead voters. Just today, an LA voter received a mailer from the "LA County Democratic" with a sample ballot advising a no vote on Prop 37. She called the LA County Democratic Party who told her that since the word "Party" isn't on the mailer, there's nothing they can do.

BEWARE OF FAKE MAILERS LIKE THE ONE ON THE LEFT.
THE REAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY (RIGHT) ENDORSES PROP 37

LA_County_Democrats.jpgcadem_slatecard_site2.jpg

 

 


Documented Deceptions of No on 37 Campaign

For Release: November 2, 2012

Today leading consumer groups revealed a long list of documented deceptions of the No on 37 Campaign, including blatant misrepresentation of the positions of leading science, professional, academic organizations and government agencies as documented below. This pattern of fraud tells the true story about how far the world's largest pesticide and junk food companies are willing to go to keep American consumers from having a choice about genetically engineered foods. Opponents of Prop 37 have been caught red handed:


commented on No on 37 Lies Again About Newspaper Endorsement 2012-10-31 15:02:59 -0700 · Flag
Joanna – many of the newspapers got it wrong, is what happened. Here is a great article by Michele Simon that points out the many false claims and inaccuracies repeated by the editorial boards, many of which did not bother to check their facts. http://truefoodnow.org/2012/10/17/california-newspaper-editorial-boards-spread-false-claims-and-faulty-logic-on-proposition-37/. Many newspapers have endorsed prop 37 including the Examiner, North County Times, East Bay Times, San Francisco Bay Guardian and many of the weeklies.

'Trial Lawyer' Claims Are Ridiculous, Inaccurate

We have the right to know what’s in our food.  That’s the simple premise of Proposition 37, which would require labeling of food that is made with genetic engineering.  But instead of taking issue with that fundamental right, opponents of the measure – the largest chemical and processed food companies – are claiming the new law would lead to a wave of costly litigation, exposing food retailers to abusive lawsuits by rapacious trial lawyers. Nothing could be further from the truth.  

See below for the facts to counter their false claims.


1  2  Next →
1812pc
co-founder of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics and author of the book Not Just a Pretty Face: The Ugly Side of the Beauty Industry. www.SafeCosmetics.org